D.C.'s "Safe RX Amendment Act" and the Licensing of Sales Reps

This post was written by Matthew E. Wetzel.

In early 2008, the District of Columbia City Council passed the SafeRX Amendment Act (the “Act”), introduced by Council Member David Catania.1 The Act requires pharmaceutical “detailers,” which includes both employees and independent contractors of pharmaceutical manufacturers, to be licensed by the District of Columbia Board of Pharmacy (the “Board”) by April 1, 2009. Pursuant to the Act and regulations issued by the Board Aug. 29, 2008,2 once a pharmaceutical detailer has been licensed by the Board, he or she must, among other things, (1) comply with the PhRMA Code on Interactions with Healthcare Professionals (“the PhRMA Code”), as well as additional requirements; (2) earn continuing education credits; and (3) follow stringent document retention requirements. This Client Alert summarizes the Act and the Board’s regulations, and includes a list of considerations for manufacturers whose employees and independent contractors must be licensed to work in the District of Columbia.

Trackbacks (1) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.lifescienceslegalupdate.com/admin/trackback/92500
Life Sciences Legal Update - November 20, 2008 6:11 PM
This post was written by Matt Wetzel and Katie Hurley. On Nov. 10, 2008, Texas joined the ranks of other states that would require drug companies to provide annual disclosures of gifts, payments and other economic benefits bestowed on health...
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.