HIPAA Preemption

In "Ex Parte Talks Allowed Under Georgia Law For Counsel, Doctors Preempted by HIPAA" (password required), the United States Law Week discusses in detail Moreland v. Austin, Georgia Sup. Ct. No. S08G0498, a November 3, 2008 decision holding that defense attorneys who wish to engage in ex parte communications with plaintiffs' treating physicians must comply with HIPAA privacy rules. Since HIPAA affords more patient privacy than a Georgia law that permitted ex parte contact once a plaintiff put his or her medical condition at issue, the Georgia law was preempted.

Preemption giveth, and preemption taketh away.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.lifescienceslegalupdate.com/admin/trackback/95503
Comments (1) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Bexis - November 22, 2008 10:10 AM

Where the Ga. Supreme Court stands on preemption depends on who's ox is being gored. When it's HIPAA preemption, favoring plaintiffs, the court falls all over itself to find premption, but when preemption benefits defendants, as in the Ferrari case, it bends over backwards in the other direction.

Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.