IRS Extends to June 10 the Deadline for Submitting Error Reports on Branded Prescription Drug Sales

This post was written by Ruth N. Holzman, Angelo Ciavarella, Joseph W. Metro and Vicky G. Gormanly.

On Friday, May 27, 2011, the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") issued Notice 2011-46 (the "New Notice"), which extended to June 10, 2011 the deadline to submit error reports in accordance with the dispute resolution process established with respect to the preliminary fee calculation of the 2011 fee imposed on certain manufacturers and importers of branded prescription drugs.

Background

Section 9008 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the “ACA”), imposes an annual fee (the “Fee”) on each “covered entity” (i.e., any manufacturer or importer with gross receipts from sales of branded prescription drugs) with gross receipts of more than $5 million from certain sales of branded prescription drugs. In Notice 2010-71 (the “Initial Notice”), the IRS provided guidance on the calculation of the Fee. For 2011, the aggregate Fee to be paid by all covered entities is $2.5 billion. The IRS will apportion this Fee among the covered entities based on each covered entity’s proportionate share of branded prescription drug sales that are taken into account during the applicable Sales Year. For a detailed description of the Initial Notice, including definitions of these terms and the methodology for calculating the Fee, see Reed Smith’s Tax Alert 10-278.

In Notice 2011-9 (the “Second Notice”), the IRS described the approach that it would use to perform a preliminary 2011 Fee calculation for each covered entity. It provided that the IRS would mail each covered entity notification of its preliminary Fee calculation for 2011 by May 16, 2011, which would be based on sales data received from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services of the Department of Health & Human Services (“CMS”), the Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) and the Department of Defense (“DOD”) with respect to each covered entity’s branded prescription drug sales sold to the Medicare Part D program, the Medicare Part B program, the Medicaid program, and any program under which branded prescription drugs are procured by the VA, DOD and DOD’s TRICARE retail pharmacy program. In the Second Notice, the IRS also requested that comments on the methodology set forth in the Second Notice be submitted by June 15, 2011. For a detailed description of the Second Notice, see Reed Smith’s Tax Alert 11-014.

In Revenue Procedure 2011-24 (the “Procedure”), the IRS established a dispute resolution process with respect to the preliminary 2011 Fee calculation. The Procedure provides the exclusive process available to covered entities to dispute a preliminary Fee calculation and obtain any change to the data that will be reflected in the final Fee calculation. Under the Procedure, the covered entity must provide one or more written error reports to the IRS that is postmarked by June 1, 2011, and the IRS will notify the covered entity in writing of the final determination when it sends the covered entity’s final Fee calculation no later than August 15, 2011. Under section 9008 of the ACA, a covered entity must pay the final Fee amount by September 30, 2011. For a detailed description of the Procedure, see Reed Smith’s Tax Alert 11-111.

The New Notice

The New Notice states that the IRS has been told that certain covered entities may have difficulty meeting the June 1 deadline for submitting error reports because of the volume of data they need to review. Therefore, the New Notice “defers” the deadlines for the following:

  • The date by which error reports under the Procedure must be postmarked in order to receive IRS consideration is extended from June 1 to June 10, 2011; and
  •  The date by which the IRS will send covered entities their 2011 final Fee calculation and, if applicable, notification of the final determination with respect to error reports, is extended from August 15 to August 24, 2011.

While many prescription drug manufacturers will be focused for the next two weeks on preparing their error reports for submission to the IRS, they should not forget that June 15 is the deadline for submitting their comments to the IRS on the methodology for calculating the Fee set forth in the Second Notice.

Reed Smith’s tax and government pricing lawyers are ready to assist clients who wish to submit error reports with respect to their preliminary Fee calculations.

This Tax Alert is intended only to provide a general summary of the information contained in the New Notice. We will provide updates as appropriate upon the issuance of any future guidance with respect to the Fee. If you have questions, would like additional information about the New Notice, or want to submit an error report with respect to your company’s preliminary Fee calculation, please contact one of the authors or the Reed Smith attorney with whom you regularly work.

To ensure compliance with Treasury Department regulations, we inform you that any federal tax advice contained in this communication is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein.

IRS Issues Guidance on the Dispute Resolution Process for the Preliminary Fee Calculation of the 2011 Fee Imposed on Manufacturers and Importers of Branded Prescription Drugs

This post was written by Ruth N. Holzman, Angelo Ciavarella and Joseph W. Metro.

On May 2, 2011, the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") issued Revenue Procedure 2011-24 (the "Revenue Procedure"), which establishes a dispute resolution process for the preliminary fee calculation for the 2011 fee imposed on certain manufacturers and importers of branded prescription drugs pursuant to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the "ACA"). As further explained below, in order to participate in the dispute resolution process, a "covered entity" must submit a written error report to the IRS that is postmarked no later than June 1, 2011.

This Tax Alert provides background on the annual fee and a summary of the dispute resolution process established by the Revenue Procedure.

IRS Extends Filing Date for Reporting 2009 Sales of Branded Prescription Drugs Under the Affordable Care Act, Clarifies Information Requested From Covered Entities

This post was written by Ruth N. Holzman, Angelo Ciavarella, Joseph W. Metro and Vicky G. Gormanly.

On January 14, 2011, the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") issued Notice 2011-9 (the "Notice"), which extended the filing date for reporting on Form 8947 a covered entity's 2009 sales of branded prescription drugs under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the "Affordable Care Act" or the "ACA"). The filing date for Form 8947 with respect to 2009 sales of branded prescription drugs was extended from January 20, 2011 to February 11, 2011. In addition, in response to numerous comments received by the IRS, the Notice made certain changes to Notice 2010-71, 2010-50 IRB (the "Initial Notice"), primarily with respect to the information requested from covered entities. Please click here to view the full alert prepared by Reed Smith Tax and Life Sciences Health Industry attorneys.

On November 29, 2010, the IRS issued the Initial Notice, which provided guidance on the calculation of the annual fee imposed on certain manufacturers and importers of branded prescription drugs for calendar years beginning after December 31, 2010. Click here to view Reed Smith's previous alert which includes a detailed description of the Initial Notice, including the definitions of "branded prescription drugs," "covered entity," "Sales Year" and "Fee Year."

IRS Issues Guidance on Calculation of the Annual Fee Imposed on Manufacturers and Importers of Branded Prescription Drugs Under the Affordable Care Act

This post was written by Ruth Holzman, Angelo Ciavarella, Joe Metro, Jeffrey Kaylor, and Vicky Gormanly.

On November 29, 2010, the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) issued Notice 2010-71, 2010-50 IRB (the “Notice”), which provides guidance on the calculation of the annual fee imposed on certain manufacturers and importers of branded prescription drugs for calendar years beginning after December 31, 2010, pursuant to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the Affordable Care Act or the “ACA”). Reed Smith Tax and LSHI attorneys have prepared an analysis of the guidance which provides background on the annual fee and a summary of the information contained in the Notice. While the Notice provides a solid starting point for IRS guidance, there are nevertheless areas of ambiguity that companies will need to evaluate. Please click here to view our full alert.

IRS Issues Guidance on New Tax Credits and Cash Grants for Small Biotech Companies

The PPACA established a tax subsidy for eligible small biotech companies known as the "qualifying therapeutic discovery project" credit. The tax subsidy consists of $1 billion of tax credits or, at the taxpayer's election, cash grants for "qualified investments" made by small biotech companies for the development of new therapies to prevent, diagnose and treat acute and chronic diseases. On May 21, 2010, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued a notice establishing the program and announcing the procedures for applying for credits or cash grants.  A Reed Smith tax alert regarding the IRS guidance is available here.

IRS Final Hospital Study and its Implications for Tax Reporting

This post was written by Carolyn D. Duronio and Kristen M. Gurdin.

On February 12, 2009, the Internal Revenue Service (the “Service”) released its long–awaited Hospital Compliance Project Final Report (the “Report”). The Service commenced the Hospital Compliance Project in 2006 by sending out comprehensive questionnaires to 544 tax-exempt hospitals. The questionnaires focused primarily on hospitals’ current practices with respect to community benefits and executive compensation. The Report details the data the Service compiled from the 487 respondent hospitals and the 20 hospitals selected for examination from that group. The Report did not provide any conclusions on whether the federal tax rules regarding community benefits and executive compensation should be changed. IRS officials’ and lawmakers’ initial interpretation of the Report and its findings, however, suggests that exempt hospitals should expect significant scrutiny of the community benefit and compensation information that they provide on the revised IRS Form 990 and that stricter requirements may be forthcoming.

For additional information, please see Reed Smith's full alert.