Tag Archives: Drug Pricing

Medicaid Rebate Program Final Rule Issued….Finally!

As previously discussed here and over on Health Industry Washington Watch here, this past Thursday, CMS and OMB issued the final, 600+ page Medicaid Rebate Program Final Rule. The pre-Federal Register version of the final rule may be accessed here. While we are still processing what this will mean for drug manufacturers and other health … Continue Reading

Proposed Budget Deal Would Add Medicaid Inflation Rebates for Generic Drugs

As noted in our recent Health Industry Washington Watch blog post, outgoing House Speaker John Boehner and the Obama Administration have reached agreement on a two-year, $80 billion budget/debt-ceiling deal that includes Medicare and Medicaid “offsets” to finance other spending.  For manufacturers of generic pharmaceuticals marketed under abbreviated new drug applications, Section 602 of the proposed … Continue Reading

340B Drug Pricing Program Omnibus Guidance Notice Published by Health Services Resources Administration

On August 28, 2015, the Health Services Resources Administration (“HRSA”) published its 340B Drug Pricing Program Omnibus Guidance Notice in the Federal Register. Although many aspects of the Notice reiterate previous HRSA guidance, several elements will generate significant debate among program stakeholders regarding the scope of the 340B program.  In addition, the Notice presages a … Continue Reading

OIG Proposes Amendment of Health Care Program Civil Monetary Penalty Regulations

The Office of Inspector General (OIG) of the Department of Health and Human Services has issued a proposed rule that would institute several changes to the health care program civil monetary penalty (CMP) regulations. Under the proposed rule, the OIG would have the expanded authority to enforce significant CMPs on providers and suppliers in a variety of scenarios. Reed Smith has prepared a Client Alert summarizing and analyzing the Proposed Rule, including the various scenarios under which CMPs could be issued under the proposed regulations as well as the changes in technical language proposed by OIG to more clearly define the scope of CMP regulations.… Continue Reading

China Life Sciences and Health Industry Client Briefing – August 2012 (September 18, 2012)

This post was written by Jay J. Yan, Hugh T. Scogin, Jr., John J. Tan, Mao Rong, Katherine Yang, May Wong, Amy Yin and Gordon B. Schatz. Reed Smith’s Life Sciences Health Industry China Briefing provides a summary of the monthly news and legal developments relating to China’s Pharmaceutical, Medical Device, and Life Sciences/ Health … Continue Reading

China Life Sciences and Health Industry Client Briefing – July 2012 (August 8, 2012)

This post was written by Jay J. Yan, Hugh T. Scogin, Jr., John J. Tan, Katherine Yang, May Wong and Gordon B. Schatz. Reed Smith’s Life Sciences Health Industry China Briefing provides a summary of the monthly news and legal developments relating to China’s Pharmaceutical, Medical Device, and Life Sciences/ Health Care Industries Some important … Continue Reading

Life Sciences Health Industry China Briefing – June 2012 (July 20, 2012)

Recent posts on www.lifescienceslegalupdate.com include: "Supreme Court Rules That Juries - Not Judges - Must Determine Facts Supporting Large Criminal Fines" The Reed Smith Global Regulatory Enforcement Law blog has an interesting post about a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that protects the Sixth Amendment rights of defendants in high-stakes criminal cases. In Southern Union Co. v. United States, the Court ruled that any fact supporting a "substantial" criminal fine must be found by a jury applying the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard. In this post, Efrem M. Grail and Kyle R. Bahr explain the opinion and discuss the wide impact it will have on criminal actions, from investigation to sentencing. View the entire entry: https://www.lifescienceslegalupdate.com/2012/07/articles/health-care/supreme-court-rules-that-juries-not-judges-must-determine-facts-supporting-large-criminal-fines/ ... and "Life Sciences Health Industry China Briefing - June 2012 (July 20, 2012)" Reed Smith's Life Sciences Health Industry China Briefing provides a summary of the monthly news and legal developments relating to China's Pharmaceutical, Medical Device, and Life Sciences/ Health Care Industries.… Continue Reading

Life Sciences Health Industry China Briefing – May 2012 (June 14, 2012)

This post was written by John Tan, Jay J. Yan, Mao Rong, Katherine Yang, and Gordon B. Schatz. Reed Smith’s Life Sciences Health Industry China Briefing provides a summary of the monthly news and legal developments relating to China’s Pharmaceutical, Medical Device, and Life Sciences/ Health Care Industries. Some important developments during May include: Introduction … Continue Reading

Life Sciences Health Industry China Briefing – March 2012 (April 13, 2012)

Reed Smith’s Life Sciences Health Industry China Briefing provides a summary of the monthly news and legal developments relating to China’s Pharmaceutical, Medical Device, and Life Sciences/ Health Care Industries.  Some developments during March include: American Medical Device Maker Accused of Bribery to Doctors in China and other Countries Qiagen Inks HPV Screening Deal with … Continue Reading

Life Sciences Health Industry China Briefing – February 2012 (March 13, 2012)

This post was written by Jay J. Yan, Mao Rong, Zack Dong, Katherine Yang, Joyce Sun, Sara Lai and Gordon B. Schatz. Reed Smith’s Life Sciences Health Industry China Briefing provides a summary of the monthly news and legal developments relating to China’s Pharmaceutical, Medical Device, and Life Sciences/ Health Care Industries. Some important developments … Continue Reading

HRSA Publishes Proposed Rule Regarding the Exclusion of Orphan Drugs for Certain 340B Covered Entities

On May 19, 2011, the Health Resources and Services Administration (“HRSA”) released a proposed rule concerning the exclusion of orphan drugs for certain covered entities under the 340B Program. The 340B Program, enacted pursuant to the Veterans Health Care Act of 1992 (“VHCA”), limits the prices that participating manufacturers may charge for outpatient drugs purchased by … Continue Reading

Pharmaceutical Package: Safe, Innovative and Accessible Medicines and A Renewed Vision For the Pharmaceutical Sector

On December 10, 2008, the European Commission published a series of political measures and legislative proposals, the so-called "Pharmaceutical Package." This series included the "Communication on a renewed vision for the pharmaceutical sector," which reflected on ways to improve market access and develop initiatives to boost European Union ("EU") pharmaceutical research. Through the Pharmaceutical Package, the European Commission aims to make pricing and reimbursement more transparent, increase the development of pharmaceutical research within the EU, improve the safety of medicines worldwide, and reinforce cooperation with international partners. The European Commission has published three separate sets of proposals amending Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community Code of medicinal products and Regulation 726/2004 on medicinal products obtained through centralized procedures: 1. A proposal amending Directive 2001/83 as "regards information to the general public on medicinal products subject to medical prescription" (Information to patient); 2. A proposal amending Directive 2001/83 and a proposal amending Regulation 726/2004 as "regards pharmacovigilance" (The EU pharmacovigilance system); and, 3. A proposal amending Directive 2001/83 as "regards the prevention of the entry into the legal supply chain of medicinal products which are falsified in relation to their identity, history or source" (Counterfeit Medicines).… Continue Reading

The Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008

On July 15, 2008, the House and Senate overrode President Bush's veto of H.R. 6331, the "Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008" ("MIPPA"). MIPPA rescinds a 10.6 percent cut in Medicare physician payments, delays a controversial medical equipment competitive bidding program, and makes numerous other Medicare and Medicaid policy changes.… Continue Reading

A Media Campaign Questions the French Monopolistic Sale of Pharmaceutical Products

This post was written by Paule Drouault-Gardrat and Julie Gottenberg. Under French Law, pharmacies benefit from a monopoly on the sale of medicinal products. This monopoly covers reimbursed and non-reimbursed pharmaceutical products. Once they are de-reimbursed, the price setting is free. This is indeed a very important market for the approximately 23,000 French pharmacies, as the … Continue Reading
LexBlog